Published - June Translation, Rewriting and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. From a positive perspective, though, rewritings, thus translations too, may play the decisive role for the evolution of a society by introducing new thoughts, artistic, and literary components.
The concept of a literary system, as suggested by Lefevere, can be applied to a theatrical system in order to allow for theorizing about this problematic and the most neglected area of Translation Studies.
Once perceived as a marginal activity, translation began to be seen as a fundamental act of human exchange. Even though the phantasms of the two systems have the same direction or tendency, they differentiate from each other in the spectacular dimension.
Toury explicitly rejects any idea that the object of translation theory is to improve the quality of translations: Throughout the history of translation, in other words, in the process of reformulation of the codes of a source language in a target language, certain rules emerging from the linguistic aspect of the understanding of translation were observed.
Theorists and scholars have a far more complex agenda than deciding between the good and the bad; they are concerned, for instance, to tease out the different possibilities open to the translator, and the way these change according to the historical, social, and cultural context.
This leads to a criticism of translation studies itself because of its Western orientation. For language, as Sherry Simon points out, does not simply mirror reality, but intervenes in the shaping of meaning.
Keywords rewriting, descriptive study, adapted translation, Hongloumeng, ideology, poetics Full Text: Translation Studies began to move out into a distinctive space of its own, beginning to research its own genealogy and seeking to assert its independence as an academic field. He also says that agents, sales teams and reviewers play a huge role in determining whether a translation will be read.
In such a world, translation is fundamental: Domestication involves making the TT read as fluently as possible, and this involves careful text selection.
The apparent division between cultural and linguistic approaches to translation that characterized much translation research until the s is disappearing, partly because of shifts in linguistics that have seen that discipline take a more overtly cultural turn, partly because those who advocated an approach to translation rooted in cultural history have become less defensive about their position.
Both original and translation are now viewed as equal products of the creativity of writer and translator, though as Paz pointed out, the task of these two is different. From decolonization to globalization.
New Perspectives in Literary Studies, Leuven: This can be done through paraphrase or explanation.ANDRÉ LEFEVERE AND TRANSLATION AS A REWRITING PROCESS: THE CANONIZATION OF BERTOLT BRECHT IN THE ANGLO-SAXON WORLD Burç Đdem DĐNÇEL ∗ Translation, probably one of the most complicated facts in human history, offers the.
Lefevere says that the power of rewriting can be seen in the example of the Greek classics that have been rewritten over and over to conform to the dominant poetics.
He believes that ideological considerations imposed by patronage outweigh the linguistic ones when determining the. Through this process some of the discursive forces that have influenced Jiang Yonglin and help shape the translation process will be revealed, illustrating Andre Lefevere's contention that.
Translation, Rewriting, and the Manipulation of Literary Fame (Routledge Translation Classics) - Kindle edition by Andre Lefevere. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Applying André Lefevere’s theory of rewriting to a descriptive study of the two adapted translations of Hongloumeng by Wang Jizhen published respectively in andthis paper attempts to investigate the effects the dominant ideology and poetics in a given society at a given time have on the translator’s choice of strategies in the translation process.
The concept “translation as rewriting” was put forward by Lefevere. According to Theo Hermans (, p. ), Lefevere developed his idea about systems and the place of “rewriting.Download